GHYIX vs. NMHIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GHYIX (Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class) and NMHIX (Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund) are both High Yield Muni funds. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GHYIX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for NMHIX.

Performance

GHYIX vs. NMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GHYIX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.40%
• 6M: 0.45%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 1Y: 6.37%
• 3Y*: 4.56%
• 5Y*: 0.29%
• 10Y*: 3.32%
• ALL TIME*: 4.41%

NMHIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GHYIX Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GHYIX vs. NMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GHYIX Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class	1.18%	3.92%	5.74%	7.34%	-14.79%	5.79%	4.96%	11.47%	4.97%	9.33%
NMHIX Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund	0.48%	3.56%	6.27%	4.34%	-14.26%	4.90%	4.04%	8.28%	2.19%	8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYIX and NMHIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.82

The correlation between GHYIX and NMHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GHYIX vs. NMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GHYIX

GHYIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
GHYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GHYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GHYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GHYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
GHYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

NMHIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GHYIX vs. NMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GHYIX	NMHIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.07	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GHYIX	NMHIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GHYIX	NMHIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.37%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.40%	—	—

GHYIX vs. NMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than NMHIX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

GHYIX vs. NMHIX - Dividend Comparison

GHYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than NMHIX's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GHYIX Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class	4.29%	6.12%	4.38%	3.56%	3.04%	3.06%	3.44%	4.03%	4.12%	4.36%	4.81%	4.88%
NMHIX Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund	3.46%	3.98%	3.81%	3.11%	2.43%	2.74%	2.90%	3.36%	3.64%	3.44%	4.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GHYIX and NMHIX in my portfolio?

GHYIX and NMHIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.