PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYIX vs. NHMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYIX vs. NHMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYIX achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than NHMRX's 3.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GHYIX having a 3.70% annualized return and NHMRX not far ahead at 3.75%.


GHYIX

1D
0.22%
1M
1.05%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.80%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
3.70%

NHMRX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.39%
YTD
3.18%
6M
3.87%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
3.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYIX vs. NHMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
2.39%3.92%5.74%7.34%-14.79%5.79%4.96%11.47%4.97%9.33%
NHMRX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3.18%3.24%5.62%7.31%-14.96%9.93%3.25%12.59%2.06%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYIX and NHMRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.72

Over the past year, GHYIX and NHMRX have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.72, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYIX vs. NHMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYIX
GHYIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GHYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

NHMRX
NHMRX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NHMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NHMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYIX vs. NHMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYIXNHMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.51

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.81

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

8.50

-0.76

GHYIX vs. NHMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the NHMRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYIX and NHMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYIXNHMRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.25

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.18

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.56

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.89

+0.11

Drawdowns

GHYIX vs. NHMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYIX drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, smaller than the maximum NHMRX drawdown of -45.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYIX and NHMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYIXNHMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-45.45%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-3.58%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.35%

-10.49%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-21.52%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

-22.22%

+2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-5.33%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

1.18%

-0.20%

Volatility

GHYIX vs. NHMRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) is 1.30%, while Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that GHYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYIXNHMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.59%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

3.17%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56%

4.50%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.35%

6.85%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.39%

6.73%

-1.34%

GHYIX vs. NHMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than NHMRX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYIX vs. NHMRX - Dividend Comparison

GHYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than NHMRX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
4.64%6.12%4.38%3.56%3.04%3.06%3.44%4.03%4.12%4.36%4.81%4.88%
NHMRX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
6.09%6.54%5.79%7.34%5.64%4.69%5.03%5.39%5.47%5.38%5.88%5.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GHYIX and NHMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NHMRX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to GHYIX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYIX dropped -35.88% vs NHMRX's -45.45%.

NHMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYIX and NHMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer