GHYG vs. SLV
GHYG (iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GHYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GHYG returned 4.82%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GHYG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
GHYG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHYG achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GHYG has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 4.82%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
GHYG
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
GHYG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYG iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 0.62% | 11.28% | 5.85% | 13.29% | -12.15% | 1.62% | 6.68% | 13.47% | -3.79% | 8.97% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYG and SLV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2012 | 0.24 |
GHYG vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GHYG
SLV
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
GHYG
SLV
-
Real Estate
GHYG
SLV
-
Basic Materials
GHYG
-
SLV
Communication Services
GHYG
-
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
GHYG
-
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
GHYG
-
SLV
-
Energy
GHYG
-
SLV
-
Financial Services
GHYG
-
SLV
-
Healthcare
GHYG
-
SLV
-
Industrials
GHYG
-
SLV
-
Technology
GHYG
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHYG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
GHYG
SLV
GHYG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHYG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.62 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 5.64 | +0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHYG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.89 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.25 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
GHYG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHYG drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYG and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -76.28% | +48.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.84% | -42.45% | +38.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.46% | -42.45% | +37.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.44% | -42.45% | +22.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.36% | -42.81% | +15.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -37.30% | +36.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -44.67% | +41.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 19.67% | -18.65% |
Volatility
GHYG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) is 1.91%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that GHYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHYG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 16.30% | -14.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.84% | 58.31% | -54.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 58.90% | -54.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 36.15% | -28.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.77% | 31.84% | -23.07% |
GHYG vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHYG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
GHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYG iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 6.23% | 6.03% | 6.11% | 5.60% | 4.64% | 4.57% | 4.36% | 4.61% | 5.62% | 4.60% | 4.61% | 4.79% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHYG and SLV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to GHYG (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYG dropped -27.36% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 4.82% for GHYG. On fees, GHYG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GHYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GHYG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
GHYG has the higher dividend yield at 6.23%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
GHYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SLV is Silver. GHYG tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GHYG and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHYG and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer