PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYG vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYG achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GHYG has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 4.82%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


GHYG

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.87%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.82%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYG
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
0.62%11.28%5.85%13.29%-12.15%1.62%6.68%13.47%-3.79%8.97%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYG and SLV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2012

0.24

GHYG vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GHYG
SLV

Utilities

99.5%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

GHYG
99.5%
SLV

-

Real Estate

GHYG
0.5%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

GHYG

-

SLV
100.0%

Communication Services

GHYG

-

SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

GHYG

-

SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

GHYG

-

SLV

-

Energy

GHYG

-

SLV

-

Financial Services

GHYG

-

SLV

-

Healthcare

GHYG

-

SLV

-

Industrials

GHYG

-

SLV

-

Technology

GHYG

-

SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYG
GHYG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYGSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.62

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

5.64

+0.55

GHYG vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYG and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYGSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.89

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.58

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.49

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.25

+0.31

Drawdowns

GHYG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYG drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYG and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYGSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-76.28%

+48.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-42.45%

+38.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.46%

-42.45%

+37.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.44%

-42.45%

+22.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.36%

-42.81%

+15.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-37.30%

+36.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-44.67%

+41.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

19.67%

-18.65%

Volatility

GHYG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) is 1.91%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that GHYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYGSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

16.30%

-14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.84%

58.31%

-54.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.69%

58.90%

-54.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.64%

36.15%

-28.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.77%

31.84%

-23.07%

GHYG vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

GHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYG
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
6.23%6.03%6.11%5.60%4.64%4.57%4.36%4.61%5.62%4.60%4.61%4.79%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYG and SLV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to GHYG (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYG dropped -27.36% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 4.82% for GHYG. On fees, GHYG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GHYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GHYG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

GHYG has the higher dividend yield at 6.23%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

GHYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SLV is Silver. GHYG tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GHYG and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYG and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer