GHYG vs. JEPI
GHYG (iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF) and JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GHYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index, while JEPI is a Dividend fund actively managed by JPMorgan. GHYG is passively managed, while JEPI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GHYG returned 3.28%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for JEPI. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GHYG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.
Performance
GHYG vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHYG achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 0.15% return.
GHYG
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
JEPI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
GHYG vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYG iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 0.62% | 11.28% | 5.85% | 13.29% | -12.15% | 1.62% | 15.88% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.15% | 8.09% | 12.57% | 9.83% | -3.49% | 21.52% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHYG and JEPI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020 | 0.53 |
The correlation between GHYG and JEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
GHYG vs. JEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GHYG
JEPI
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
GHYG
JEPI
Real Estate
GHYG
JEPI
Basic Materials
GHYG
-
JEPI
Communication Services
GHYG
-
JEPI
Consumer Cyclical
GHYG
-
JEPI
Consumer Defensive
GHYG
-
JEPI
Energy
GHYG
-
JEPI
Financial Services
GHYG
-
JEPI
Healthcare
GHYG
-
JEPI
Industrials
GHYG
-
JEPI
Technology
GHYG
-
JEPI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHYG vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank
GHYG
JEPI
GHYG vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHYG | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.16 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 3.73 | +2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHYG | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.99 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.66 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.01 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
GHYG vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHYG drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYG and JEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHYG | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -13.71% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.84% | -6.68% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.46% | -13.26% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.44% | -13.71% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -4.83% | +4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -2.12% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 2.07% | -1.05% |
Volatility
GHYG vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) at 1.35%. This indicates that GHYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHYG | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 1.35% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.84% | 6.07% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 7.85% | -3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 11.06% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.77% | 10.80% | -2.03% |
GHYG vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHYG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHYG vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison
GHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, less than JEPI's 8.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHYG iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 6.23% | 6.03% | 6.11% | 5.60% | 4.64% | 4.57% | 4.36% | 4.61% | 5.62% | 4.60% | 4.61% | 4.79% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.27% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 8.40% | 11.68% | 6.59% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHYG and JEPI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHYG has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to JEPI (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYG dropped -27.36% vs JEPI's -13.71%.
On 5-year performance, JEPI leads with 7.26% vs 3.28% for GHYG. On fees, JEPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JEPI has performed better with a 7.26% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GHYG.
JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 6.23% for GHYG.
GHYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while JEPI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GHYG and 0.35% for JEPI.
GHYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHYG and JEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer