PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYG vs. IBHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYG vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYG achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than IBHG's 0.96% return.


GHYG

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.87%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.82%

IBHG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.96%
6M
1.46%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYG vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GHYG
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
0.62%11.28%5.85%13.29%-12.15%-0.37%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
0.96%6.90%7.42%11.27%-8.88%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYG and IBHG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021

0.77

The correlation between GHYG and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYG vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYG
GHYG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHG
IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYG vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYGIBHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

6.38

-4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

23.30

-17.10

GHYG vs. IBHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the IBHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYG and IBHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYGIBHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.20

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.56

-0.01

Drawdowns

GHYG vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYG drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than IBHG's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYG and IBHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYGIBHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-13.85%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-0.73%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.46%

-3.39%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.22%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-2.67%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.20%

+0.82%

Volatility

GHYG vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison

iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) has a higher volatility of 1.91% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.58%. This indicates that GHYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYGIBHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

0.58%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.84%

1.53%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.69%

2.11%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.64%

6.37%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.77%

6.37%

+2.40%

GHYG vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYG vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison

GHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than IBHG's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYG
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
6.23%6.03%6.11%5.60%4.64%4.57%4.36%4.61%5.62%4.60%4.61%4.79%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.08%6.33%7.02%6.66%5.62%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYG and IBHG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHYG has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to IBHG (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYG dropped -27.36% vs IBHG's -13.85%.

On 3-year performance, GHYG leads with 8.91% vs 7.37% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GHYG has performed better with a 8.91% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GHYG.

GHYG has the higher dividend yield at 6.23%, compared with 6.08% for IBHG.

GHYG tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GHYG and 0.35% for IBHG.

IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYG and IBHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer