PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYG vs. ANGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYG vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYG achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GHYG has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 4.63%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.85% annualized return.


GHYG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
6M
0.14%
YTD
0.94%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
8.24%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
4.63%
ALL TIME*
4.55%

ANGL

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.82%
6M
0.99%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
5.85%
ALL TIME*
6.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.07M$20.69M$19.68M
$1.17M$1.68M$1.13M

GHYG vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHYG
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
0.94%11.28%5.85%13.29%-12.15%1.62%6.68%13.47%-3.79%8.97%
ANGL
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
1.76%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYG and ANGL is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2012

0.57

Over the past year, GHYG and ANGL have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYG vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GHYG
GHYG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GHYG vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GHYGANGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.44

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

5.94

-1.85

GHYG vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYG and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GHYG vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYG drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum ANGL drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYG and ANGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYGANGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-29.31%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-4.05%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.15%

-5.48%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.44%

-19.25%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.36%

-29.31%

+1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.89%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-3.27%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.98%

+0.08%

Volatility

GHYG vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) and VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) have volatilities of 0.94% and 0.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYGANGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.91%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

3.61%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

4.34%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.62%

7.63%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.71%

9.23%

-0.52%

GHYG vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYG vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

GHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, less than ANGL's 6.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
5.95%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
GHYG
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
5.72%6.03%6.11%5.60%4.64%4.57%4.36%4.61%5.62%4.60%4.61%4.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYG and ANGL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHYG has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to ANGL (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHYG dropped -27.36% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

On 10-year performance, ANGL leads with 5.85% vs 4.63% for GHYG. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ANGL has performed better with a 5.85% return vs 4.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ANGL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GHYG.

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 5.72% for GHYG.

GHYG tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index, while ANGL tracks ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GHYG and 0.25% for ANGL.

ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYG and ANGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer