PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GHYG.L) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHYG.L achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than GFGB.L's 3.80% return.


GHYG.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.48%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
7.81%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*

GFGB.L

1D
0.23%
1M
1.74%
YTD
3.80%
6M
3.63%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GHYG.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.87%7.92%6.96%11.12%-9.49%3.39%2.46%3.92%
GFGB.L
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
3.80%2.41%7.87%4.27%-2.32%3.31%13.08%4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GHYG.L and GFGB.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2019

0.25

The correlation between GHYG.L and GFGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHYG.L
GHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

GFGB.L
GFGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GFGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GFGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GHYG.L) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHYG.LGFGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.25

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.23

8.50

+0.73

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHYG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the GFGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHYG.L and GFGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHYG.LGFGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.43

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.55

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.67

-0.21

Drawdowns

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.01%, which is greater than GFGB.L's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHYG.L and GFGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHYG.LGFGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.01%

-15.95%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-3.04%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.57%

-7.54%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.45%

-10.36%

-4.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.13%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-2.52%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

1.16%

-0.57%

Volatility

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GHYG.L) is 1.28%, while VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that GHYG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHYG.LGFGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

3.51%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

5.86%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60%

6.89%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

7.81%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.88%

8.80%

-0.92%

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHYG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GFGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHYG.L vs. GFGB.L - Dividend Comparison

GHYG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, while GFGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GFGB.L
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GHYG.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
5.38%5.34%5.26%4.69%4.15%3.73%4.54%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHYG.L and GFGB.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GFGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GFGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GHYG.L.

GHYG.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP, while GFGB.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for GHYG.L and 0.40% for GFGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHYG.L and GFGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer