GHY vs. JEPQ
GHY (PGIM Global High Yield Fund) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both funds - GHY is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, GHY returned 13.14%/yr vs 19.68%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GHY charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
GHY vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHY achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.54% return.
GHY
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -0.94%
- 1Y
- -2.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- 6.89%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHY vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | -1.06% | 10.46% | 20.25% | 17.29% | -8.25% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.54% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHY and JEPQ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHY vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
GHY
JEPQ
GHY vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHY | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.36 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 2.68 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 12.63 | -13.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHY vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHY drawdown since its inception was -41.35%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHY and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHY | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.35% | -20.07% | -21.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -8.82% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.36% | -20.07% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -2.75% | -3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -3.39% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 1.86% | +3.03% |
Volatility
GHY vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Global High Yield Fund (GHY) is 3.13%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that GHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHY | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 6.27% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 10.52% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 13.06% | -2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 16.78% | -2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 16.78% | -1.44% |
GHY vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHY has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHY vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
GHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than JEPQ's 10.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHY PGIM Global High Yield Fund | 10.78% | 10.21% | 10.23% | 11.09% | 11.62% | 8.35% | 8.67% | 8.04% | 7.72% | 7.77% | 8.53% | 10.07% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.25% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHY and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JEPQ has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to GHY (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHY dropped -41.35% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHY and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer