PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GHTMX vs. IVFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GHTMX vs. IVFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Tax- Managed Equity Fund (GHTMX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHTMX achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly higher than IVFIX's 6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, GHTMX has outperformed IVFIX with an annualized return of 10.60%, while IVFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.83% annualized return.


GHTMX

1D
0.47%
1M
5.76%
YTD
13.30%
6M
15.69%
1Y
30.21%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
10.60%

IVFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.36%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHTMX vs. IVFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GHTMX
Goldman Sachs International Tax- Managed Equity Fund
13.30%39.51%6.30%20.20%-15.00%12.41%10.14%19.01%-16.52%29.42%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
6.24%31.79%1.91%11.05%-2.54%11.58%-1.74%20.15%-11.96%14.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GHTMX and IVFIX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between GHTMX and IVFIX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GHTMX vs. IVFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHTMX
GHTMX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GHTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GHTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IVFIX
IVFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IVFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IVFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHTMX vs. IVFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Tax- Managed Equity Fund (GHTMX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GHTMXIVFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.71

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

7.31

+1.77

GHTMX vs. IVFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GHTMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the IVFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GHTMX and IVFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GHTMXIVFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.57

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.73

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.47

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.21

+0.29

Drawdowns

GHTMX vs. IVFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHTMX drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, smaller than the maximum IVFIX drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTMX and IVFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GHTMXIVFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.64%

-51.49%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-6.97%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-10.75%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.93%

-21.29%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

-33.46%

-5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-5.67%

+5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-11.62%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.59%

+0.67%

Volatility

GHTMX vs. IVFIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Tax- Managed Equity Fund (GHTMX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) have volatilities of 5.02% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GHTMXIVFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

4.83%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

9.35%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

12.10%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

13.13%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

14.78%

+1.77%

GHTMX vs. IVFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHTMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IVFIX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GHTMX vs. IVFIX - Dividend Comparison

GHTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than IVFIX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHTMX
Goldman Sachs International Tax- Managed Equity Fund
1.92%2.18%2.18%2.33%3.56%3.00%1.44%1.95%1.65%1.86%1.85%1.47%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
3.58%3.37%4.44%4.01%3.99%3.67%3.62%3.98%4.97%4.17%3.38%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


GHTMX and IVFIX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHTMX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to IVFIX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHTMX dropped -38.64% vs IVFIX's -51.49%.

GHTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GHTMX and IVFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer