PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

GGUS.AX (Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF) and HACK.AX (BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGUS.AX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BetaShares, while HACK.AX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BetaShares Global Cybersecurity Index. GGUS.AX is actively managed, while HACK.AX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGUS.AX returned 13.72%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for HACK.AX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX) and BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGUS.AX achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly lower than HACK.AX's 19.47% return.

GGUS.AX

1D
-2.97%
1M
-2.35%
6M
12.93%
YTD
15.21%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
29.41%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
20.86%

HACK.AX

1D
-3.17%
1M
7.33%
6M
19.97%
YTD
19.47%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
24.08%
5Y*
15.46%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGUS.AX
Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF		15.21%18.83%45.64%49.70%-47.20%68.07%17.37%70.51%-21.12%45.08%
HACK.AX
BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF		19.47%5.13%30.33%38.85%-22.09%27.02%37.05%29.69%11.30%6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GGUS.AX and HACK.AX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.56

The correlation between GGUS.AX and HACK.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF

BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF

Often compared with GGUS.AX:
GGUS.AX vs. DHHF.AXGGUS.AX vs. EX20.AXGGUS.AX vs. F100.AXGGUS.AX vs. FOOD.AXGGUS.AX vs. FUEL.AXGGUS.AX vs. GEAR.AXGGUS.AX vs. GNDQ.AX
Often compared with HACK.AX:
HACK.AX vs. A200.AXHACK.AX vs. ARMR.AXHACK.AX vs. DHHF.AXHACK.AX vs. EX20.AXHACK.AX vs. FOOD.AXHACK.AX vs. FUEL.AXHACK.AX vs. GEAR.AX

Return for Risk

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGUS.AX
GGUS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGUS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGUS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
HACK.AX
HACK.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HACK.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX) and BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

GGUS.AXHACK.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.17
0.53

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.67
0.91

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

0.48

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

1.06

+5.82

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGUS.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the HACK.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGUS.AX and HACK.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGUS.AX drawdown since its inception was -64.26%, which is greater than HACK.AX's maximum drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS.AX and HACK.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GGUS.AXHACK.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.26%

-28.43%

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.90%

-28.43%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.78%

-28.43%

-18.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.53%

-28.43%

-27.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.26%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-4.68%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.41%

-7.14%

-6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

13.05%

-7.80%

Volatility

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF (GGUS.AX) is 6.38%, while BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK.AX) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that GGUS.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GGUS.AXHACK.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

8.99%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

24.00%

+1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

26.06%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.72%

22.87%

+18.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.74%

21.73%

+19.01%

Dividends

GGUS.AX vs. HACK.AX - Dividend Comparison

GGUS.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GGUS.AX
Betashares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF		0.00%1.69%0.00%0.00%6.12%2.52%0.00%0.12%0.96%0.62%0.89%
HACK.AX
BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF		3.73%3.03%0.56%0.00%8.73%2.71%10.37%9.58%5.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GGUS.AX and HACK.AX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGUS.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while HACK.AX is Technology Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGUS.AX and HACK.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer