HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HACK.AX (BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF) and FUEL.AX (Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HACK.AX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BetaShares Global Cybersecurity Index, while FUEL.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HACK.AX returned 16.21%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for FUEL.AX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK.AX) and Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HACK.AX having a 23.38% return and FUEL.AX slightly higher at 24.46%.

HACK.AX

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: 8.47%
• 6M: 23.29%
• YTD: 23.38%
• 1Y: 18.50%
• 3Y*: 25.92%
• 5Y*: 16.21%
• 10Y*: —

FUEL.AX

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 17.84%
• YTD: 24.46%
• 1Y: 30.85%
• 3Y*: 13.25%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: 5.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HACK.AX BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF	23.38%	5.13%	30.33%	38.85%	-22.09%	27.02%	37.05%	29.69%	11.30%	6.43%
FUEL.AX Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF	24.46%	10.28%	-1.04%	-2.17%	37.74%	29.02%	-32.28%	10.04%	-11.41%	2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between HACK.AX and FUEL.AX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016	0.15

The correlation between HACK.AX and FUEL.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACK.AX

HACK.AX Risk / Return Rank: 21
HACK.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HACK.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
HACK.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
HACK.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HACK.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FUEL.AX

FUEL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 52
FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FUEL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FUEL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FUEL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FUEL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK.AX) and Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HACK.AX	FUEL.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	1.39	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	2.03	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.27	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	2.42	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.42	7.20	-5.78

HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACK.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the FUEL.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACK.AX and FUEL.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACK.AX drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, smaller than the maximum FUEL.AX drawdown of -65.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK.AX and FUEL.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HACK.AX	FUEL.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.43%	-65.66%	+37.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.43%	-12.87%	-15.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.43%	-22.90%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.43%	-23.54%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-7.65%	+6.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.14%	-13.62%	+6.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.05%	4.37%	+8.68%

Volatility

HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Volatility Comparison

BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK.AX) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FUEL.AX) at 5.70%. This indicates that HACK.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUEL.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HACK.AX	FUEL.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.24%	5.70%	+2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.78%	19.38%	+4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.87%	22.36%	+3.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.83%	24.26%	-1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	26.38%	-4.67%

Dividends

HACK.AX vs. FUEL.AX - Dividend Comparison

HACK.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than FUEL.AX's 3.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FUEL.AX Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF	3.37%	0.00%	2.16%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.64%	1.25%	1.92%	3.02%
HACK.AX BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF	3.61%	3.03%	0.56%	0.00%	8.73%	2.71%	10.37%	9.58%	5.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HACK.AX and FUEL.AX in my portfolio?

HACK.AX and FUEL.AX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HACK.AX and FUEL.AX?

HACK.AX is categorized as Technology Equities, while FUEL.AX is Global Equities. HACK.AX tracks BetaShares Global Cybersecurity Index, while FUEL.AX tracks Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged Index.