PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GGRP.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) and PRWU.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Global Equities funds - GGRP.L tracks the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth while PRWU.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGRP.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRWU.L.

Performance

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GGRP.L is traded in GBp, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

GGRP.L

1D
0.39%
1M
4.76%
YTD
4.80%
6M
5.35%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
—

PRWU.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GGRP.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD		4.80%7.06%9.85%11.62%5.65%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)		0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRP.L and PRWU.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.58

The correlation between GGRP.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GGRP.L
PRWU.L

Technology

21.6%
27.0%

Industrials

18.8%
9.9%

Healthcare

15.7%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
10.5%

Communication Services

8.6%
8.1%

Financial Services

8.4%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
6.1%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.2%

Utilities

0.4%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.1%

Energy

0.0%
4.0%

Technology

GGRP.L
21.6%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Industrials

GGRP.L
18.8%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Healthcare

GGRP.L
15.7%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GGRP.L
15.4%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Communication Services

GGRP.L
8.6%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Financial Services

GGRP.L
8.4%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

GGRP.L
7.2%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Basic Materials

GGRP.L
3.7%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Utilities

GGRP.L
0.4%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Real Estate

GGRP.L
0.2%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Energy

GGRP.L
0.0%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD

Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)

Often compared with GGRP.L:
GGRP.L vs. GGRG.LGGRP.L vs. FGQD.LGGRP.L vs. VHYG.LGGRP.L vs. HMWO.LGGRP.L vs. SCHDGGRP.L vs. QWLDGGRP.L vs. TDGB.L
Often compared with PRWU.L:
PRWU.L vs. SPYI.DEPRWU.L vs. VWRA.LPRWU.L vs. SWDA.LPRWU.L vs. LILMPRWU.L vs. CSPX.LPRWU.L vs. SWRD.LPRWU.L vs. VT

Return for Risk

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGRP.L
GGRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GGRP.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.60

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.39

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GGRP.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

—

—

Drawdowns

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GGRP.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.46%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

—

—

Volatility

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GGRP.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.07%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.35%

—

—

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRP.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGRP.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

GGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRP.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD		0.01%0.01%0.54%1.86%2.42%1.60%1.46%1.88%2.13%1.41%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GGRP.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRP.L.

GGRP.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while PRWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRP.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRP.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer