GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L
GGRP.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) and CSH2.L (Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - GGRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while CSH2.L is a Money Market fund actively managed by Amundi. GGRP.L is passively managed, while CSH2.L is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRP.L returned 8.98%/yr vs 3.68%/yr for CSH2.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GGRP.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSH2.L.
Performance
GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRP.L achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 1.83% return.
GGRP.L
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- —
CSH2.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 4.96% | 8.49% | 11.07% | 11.60% | -3.21% | 20.97% | 11.56% | 28.30% | -5.39% | 17.37% |
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP | 1.83% | 4.67% | 5.61% | 4.72% | 1.54% | 0.13% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.70% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRP.L and CSH2.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGRP.L
CSH2.L
GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGRP.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 4.50 | -3.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 27.58 | -25.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 161.52 | -154.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -0.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRP.L and CSH2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRP.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.60% | -0.37% | -22.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -0.16% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.25% | -0.29% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.25% | -0.29% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | 0.00% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -0.00% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 0.03% | +2.20% |
Volatility
GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) at 0.08%. This indicates that GGRP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRP.L | CSH2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 0.08% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 0.24% | +7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.26% | 0.53% | +9.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.02% | 0.56% | +11.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 0.44% | +14.44% |
GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRP.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGRP.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison
GGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GGRP.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.61% | 1.84% | 2.42% | 1.60% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 2.14% | 1.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRP.L and CSH2.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRP.L.
GGRP.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CSH2.L is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRP.L and 0.07% for CSH2.L.
Find the right allocation for GGRP.L and CSH2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer