PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GGRG.L is traded in GBp, while QQQ3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRG.L achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ3.L's 56.69% return.


GGRG.L

1D
0.22%
1M
2.95%
YTD
5.29%
6M
5.38%
1Y
17.71%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*

QQQ3.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
21.42%
YTD
56.69%
6M
49.06%
1Y
122.20%
3Y*
59.98%
5Y*
28.18%
10Y*
45.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRG.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
5.29%8.36%11.10%11.54%-3.39%20.90%12.53%29.81%-5.38%17.54%
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
56.65%18.54%62.70%194.03%-77.15%89.15%103.95%120.21%-16.62%95.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRG.L and QQQ3.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.69

The correlation between GGRG.L and QQQ3.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRG.L
GGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ3.L
QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGRG.LQQQ3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.51

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

10.30

-2.52

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRG.L and QQQ3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGRG.LQQQ3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.73

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.47

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.87

+0.06

Drawdowns

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.15%, smaller than the maximum QQQ3.L drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRG.L and QQQ3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGRG.LQQQ3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.15%

-79.21%

+57.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-35.87%

+27.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-58.56%

+42.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-79.21%

+63.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.48%

+2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-18.79%

+15.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

12.24%

-9.98%

Volatility

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) is 2.62%, while WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a volatility of 14.53%. This indicates that GGRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGRG.LQQQ3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

14.53%

-11.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

33.84%

-25.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

46.05%

-35.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.13%

60.35%

-48.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.52%

58.56%

-45.04%

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRG.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGRG.L vs. QQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGRG.L nor QQQ3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GGRG.L and QQQ3.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGRG.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGRG.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

GGRG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ3.L is Nasdaq-100. GGRG.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRG.L and 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRG.L and QQQ3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer