GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L
GGRG.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and IQSA.L (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds. GGRG.L is passively managed, while IQSA.L is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRG.L returned 9.18%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for IQSA.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGRG.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQSA.L.
Performance
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GGRG.L is traded in GBp, while IQSA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IQSA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRG.L achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than IQSA.L's 14.53% return.
GGRG.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- —
IQSA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 15.63%
- 10Y*
- —
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRG.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 5.29% | 8.36% | 11.10% | 11.54% | -3.39% | 20.90% | 12.53% | 6.47% |
IQSA.L Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.53% | 13.93% | 24.97% | 18.16% | -3.78% | 26.14% | 6.97% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRG.L and IQSA.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between GGRG.L and IQSA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Industrials
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Healthcare
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Consumer Cyclical
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Communication Services
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Financial Services
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Consumer Defensive
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Basic Materials
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Utilities
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Real Estate
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
Energy
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGRG.L
IQSA.L
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGRG.L | IQSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 4.96 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 19.21 | -11.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGRG.L | IQSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.50 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 1.02 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.88 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.15%, smaller than the maximum IQSA.L drawdown of -26.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRG.L and IQSA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRG.L | IQSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -26.59% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -6.45% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.17% | -19.19% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.17% | -19.19% | +3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -3.25% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.67% | +0.59% |
Volatility
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) is 2.62%, while Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that GGRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRG.L | IQSA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 3.99% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 9.96% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 12.80% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.13% | 15.33% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 17.00% | -3.48% |
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRG.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSA.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGRG.L vs. IQSA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGRG.L nor IQSA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRG.L and IQSA.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSA.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSA.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRG.L.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRG.L and 0.30% for IQSA.L.
Find the right allocation for GGRG.L and IQSA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer