PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGME vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGME vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 20.20% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed XT with an annualized return of 10.45%, while XT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.70% annualized return.


GGME

1D
-0.32%
1M
12.63%
YTD
7.37%
6M
5.66%
1Y
13.51%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
10.45%

XT

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
20.20%
6M
20.54%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGME vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
7.37%16.39%32.67%23.76%-36.43%10.68%36.26%20.28%1.97%7.61%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.20%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%30.74%-4.93%33.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GGME and XT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015

0.78

The correlation between GGME and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGME vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GGME
XT

Technology

56.5%
43.5%

Communication Services

40.1%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
7.9%

Industrials

0.4%
10.1%

Financial Services

0.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

23.4%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Technology

GGME
56.5%
XT
43.5%

Communication Services

GGME
40.1%
XT
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GGME
3.0%
XT
7.9%

Industrials

GGME
0.4%
XT
10.1%

Financial Services

GGME
0.3%
XT
3.3%

Basic Materials

GGME

-

XT
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

GGME

-

XT
0.0%

Energy

GGME

-

XT
0.3%

Healthcare

GGME

-

XT
23.4%

Real Estate

GGME

-

XT
0.0%

Utilities

GGME

-

XT
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGME vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGME
GGME Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGME Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGME vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGMEXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.48

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

4.41

-3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

18.51

-17.30

GGME vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGME and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGMEXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

2.89

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.41

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.73

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.66

-0.31

Drawdowns

GGME vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGMEXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.13%

-34.41%

-34.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-10.45%

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-22.09%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.90%

-34.41%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.35%

-34.41%

-11.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-0.47%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-7.41%

-7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.22%

2.49%

+8.73%

Volatility

GGME vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that GGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGMEXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

4.85%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

11.94%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

15.99%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.16%

20.76%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

20.08%

+3.06%

GGME vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGME vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
0.12%0.17%0.08%2.31%0.76%0.39%0.38%0.50%0.93%0.33%0.16%1.11%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.61%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGME and XT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGME has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 10-year performance, XT leads with 14.70% vs 10.45% for GGME. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XT has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.12% for GGME.

GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.46% for XT.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGME and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer