GGME vs. GTEK

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) and GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. GGME is passively managed, while GTEK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GGME returned 20.00%/yr vs 30.01%/yr for GTEK. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGME charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GTEK.

Performance

GGME vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than GTEK's 43.93% return.

GGME

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.88%
• 6M: 7.14%
• YTD: 4.57%
• 1Y: 3.31%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: 10.02%

GTEK

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 37.67%
• YTD: 43.93%
• 1Y: 61.00%
• 3Y*: 30.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGME vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF	4.57%	16.39%	32.67%	23.76%	-36.43%	-6.18%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	43.93%	23.68%	15.94%	33.58%	-46.73%	-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GGME and GTEK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021	0.82

The correlation between GGME and GTEK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGME vs. GTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GGME	GTEK
Technology	61.0%	74.5%
Communication Services	35.7%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	2.8%	4.9%
Industrials	0.5%	8.1%
Financial Services	0.3%	1.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	1.1%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GGME vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGME

GGME Risk / Return Rank: 11
GGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
GGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
GGME Omega Ratio Rank: 12
GGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
GGME Martin Ratio Rank: 11

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 82
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGME vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGME	GTEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	2.06	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	2.61	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.34	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	5.51	-5.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	16.03	-15.75

GGME vs. GTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the GTEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGME and GTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGME vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than GTEK's maximum drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and GTEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGME	GTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.13%	-53.77%	-15.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.23%	-11.13%	-14.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.23%	-27.49%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	-8.53%	+3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.51%	-26.98%	+12.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.54%	3.82%	+7.72%

Volatility

GGME vs. GTEK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is 5.91%, while Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that GGME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGME	GTEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.91%	11.82%	-5.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.32%	26.11%	-9.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.77%	29.70%	-9.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.36%	28.82%	-4.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.20%	28.82%	-5.62%

GGME vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GTEK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGME vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF	0.02%	0.17%	0.08%	2.31%	0.76%	0.39%	0.38%	0.50%	0.93%	0.33%	0.16%	1.11%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGME and GTEK in my portfolio?

GGME and GTEK have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGME or GTEK?

GTEK has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to GGME (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs GTEK's -53.77%.

Which ETF is better, GGME or GTEK?

On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 30.01% vs 20.00% for GGME. On fees, GGME is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GGME has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GGME or GTEK?

Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 30.01% return vs 20.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GGME or GTEK?

GGME is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GGME or GTEK?

GGME has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between GGME and GTEK?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.75% for GTEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.