GGM vs. ONOF
GGM (GGM Macro Alignment ETF) and ONOF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GGM is actively managed, while ONOF is passively managed. Over the past year, GGM returned 17.66% vs 17.58% for ONOF. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGM charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ONOF.
Performance
GGM vs. ONOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGM achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than ONOF's 6.61% return.
GGM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONOF
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 17.58%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
GGM vs. ONOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GGM GGM Macro Alignment ETF | 11.95% | 1.24% | 4.46% | 7.04% |
ONOF Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF | 6.61% | 8.90% | 19.45% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGM and ONOF is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between GGM and ONOF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGM vs. ONOF — Risk / Return Rank
GGM
ONOF
GGM vs. ONOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GGM Macro Alignment ETF (GGM) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGM | ONOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.57 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 8.33 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGM vs. ONOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGM drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, smaller than the maximum ONOF drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGM and ONOF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGM | ONOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.68% | -26.21% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -6.86% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -1.34% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -6.09% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 2.12% | +0.31% |
Volatility
GGM vs. ONOF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GGM Macro Alignment ETF (GGM) is 4.03%, while Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that GGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGM | ONOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 5.00% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 9.02% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 11.89% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 14.43% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 14.37% | -1.08% |
GGM vs. ONOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGM has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than ONOF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGM vs. ONOF - Dividend Comparison
GGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than ONOF's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGM GGM Macro Alignment ETF | 1.40% | 1.57% | 1.39% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONOF Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF | 1.23% | 1.38% | 0.93% | 1.37% | 1.92% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGM and ONOF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONOF has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to GGM (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGM dropped -19.68% vs ONOF's -26.21%.
On 1-year performance, GGM leads with 17.66% vs 17.58% for ONOF. On fees, ONOF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GGM has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GGM has performed better with a 17.66% return vs 17.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONOF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for GGM.
GGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.23% for ONOF.
They also come from different issuers: GGM Wealth Advisors and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for GGM and 0.39% for ONOF.
ONOF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGM and ONOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer