GGLS vs. SPDN
GGLS (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - GGLS tracks the Alphabet Inc. Class A (--100%) while SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GGLS returned -31.32%/yr vs -11.38%/yr for SPDN. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGLS charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
GGLS vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGLS achieves a -14.98% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -7.28% return.
GGLS
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -8.79%
- YTD
- -14.98%
- 1Y
- -51.51%
- 3Y*
- -31.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -7.28%
- 1Y
- -12.83%
- 3Y*
- -11.38%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -12.26%
GGLS vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLS Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares | -14.98% | -42.64% | -26.50% | -37.72% | 19.63% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -7.28% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGLS and SPDN is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between GGLS and SPDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGLS vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
GGLS
SPDN
GGLS vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGLS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.81 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -1.54 | +0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGLS vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGLS drawdown since its inception was -81.24%, which is greater than SPDN's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLS and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGLS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.24% | -75.31% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.40% | -15.93% | -40.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.36% | -38.24% | -34.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.11% | -75.03% | -4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.71% | -48.80% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.03% | 8.34% | +31.69% |
Volatility
GGLS vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 3.87%. This indicates that GGLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGLS | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.67% | 3.87% | +5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.75% | 10.06% | +12.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.95% | 12.71% | +17.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.28% | 16.97% | +14.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.28% | 18.01% | +13.27% |
GGLS vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGLS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGLS vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
GGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than SPDN's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLS Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares | 3.00% | 4.87% | 4.31% | 5.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.35% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGLS and SPDN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGLS has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to SPDN (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGLS dropped -81.24% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 3-year performance, SPDN leads with -11.38% vs -31.32% for GGLS. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -11.38% return vs -31.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for GGLS.
SPDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 3.00% for GGLS.
GGLS tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (--100%), while SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for GGLS and 0.50% for SPDN.
SPDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.01 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGLS and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer