GGLL vs. NRGU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - GGLL tracks the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%) while NRGU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GGLL returned 213.08% vs 119.26% for NRGU. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GGLL charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

GGLL vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGLL achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 118.00% return.

GGLL

• 1D: -8.96%
• 1M: -11.55%
• 6M: 2.86%
• YTD: 15.84%
• 1Y: 213.08%
• 3Y*: 63.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: 18.77%
• 6M: 86.19%
• YTD: 118.00%
• 1Y: 119.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGLL vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	15.84%	140.30%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	118.00%	-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GGLL and NRGU is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.03

The correlation between GGLL and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GGLL vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GGLL	NRGU
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GGLL vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGLL

GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 93
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 55
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGLL vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGLL	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	1.56	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	2.08	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.26	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.59	2.73	+2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.06	6.13	+9.93

GGLL vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGLL Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGLL and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGLL vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGLL drawdown since its inception was -52.81%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLL and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGLL	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.81%	-57.50%	+4.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.39%	-43.89%	+5.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.15%	-24.81%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.36%	-26.06%	+10.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.33%	19.53%	-6.20%

Volatility

GGLL vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) is 21.63%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 23.48%. This indicates that GGLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGLL	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.63%	23.48%	-1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.92%	63.97%	-19.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.88%	76.98%	-16.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.45%	89.07%	-32.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.45%	89.07%	-32.62%

GGLL vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGLL has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGLL vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	4.25%	4.16%	3.29%	2.05%	0.59%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGLL and NRGU in my portfolio?

GGLL and NRGU have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGLL or NRGU?

NRGU has higher volatility (23.48%) compared to GGLL (21.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGLL dropped -52.81% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, GGLL or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, GGLL leads with 213.08% vs 119.26% for NRGU. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GGLL has been the lower-risk option at 21.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GGLL or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 213.08% return vs 119.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GGLL or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GGLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GGLL or NRGU?

GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between GGLL and NRGU?

GGLL tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%), while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GGLL and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.