PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGLL vs. COIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGLL vs. COIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGLL achieves a 22.24% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -61.85% return.


GGLL

1D
-1.40%
1M
-13.22%
YTD
22.24%
6M
15.91%
1Y
293.20%
3Y*
65.97%
5Y*
10Y*

COIG

1D
-11.21%
1M
-37.91%
YTD
-61.85%
6M
-75.19%
1Y
-79.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGLL vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GGLL and COIG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGLL vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGLL
GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

COIG
COIG Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGLL vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGLLCOIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

0.93

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.69

-0.86

+8.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.53

-1.20

+27.73

GGLL vs. COIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGLL Sharpe Ratio is 5.07, which is higher than the COIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGLL and COIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGLLCOIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.07

-0.57

+5.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

-0.40

+1.38

Drawdowns

GGLL vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGLL drawdown since its inception was -52.81%, smaller than the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLL and COIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGLLCOIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.81%

-92.06%

+39.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.39%

-92.06%

+53.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.02%

-91.42%

+70.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-51.70%

+36.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.11%

65.88%

-54.77%

Volatility

GGLL vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) is 16.60%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a volatility of 37.85%. This indicates that GGLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGLLCOIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.60%

37.85%

-21.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.70%

100.21%

-59.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.40%

139.35%

-80.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.03%

146.45%

-90.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.03%

146.45%

-90.42%

GGLL vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGLL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGLL vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison

GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, while COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
COIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
3.73%4.16%3.29%2.05%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGLL and COIG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIG has higher volatility (37.85%) compared to GGLL (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGLL dropped -52.81% vs COIG's -92.06%.

On 1-year performance, GGLL leads with 293.20% vs -79.30% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GGLL has been the lower-risk option at 16.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 293.20% return vs -79.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for GGLL.

GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for GGLL and 0.75% for COIG.

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGLL and COIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer