PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGIZX vs. GMTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGIZX vs. GMTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIZX achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly higher than GMTZX's 5.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GGIZX has outperformed GMTZX with an annualized return of 6.39%, while GMTZX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.92% annualized return.


GGIZX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.94%
YTD
5.35%
6M
5.74%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
6.39%

GMTZX

1D
0.09%
1M
2.38%
YTD
5.07%
6M
5.38%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIZX vs. GMTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
5.35%12.49%8.34%12.32%-15.60%6.94%10.66%17.36%-4.88%12.31%
GMTZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund
5.07%11.55%7.50%10.86%-13.11%6.74%9.16%15.10%-3.68%11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIZX and GMTZX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.97

The correlation between GGIZX and GMTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGIZX vs. GMTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIZX
GGIZX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GGIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GGIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GMTZX
GMTZX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GMTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GMTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIZX vs. GMTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGIZXGMTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.71

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

12.40

-1.62

GGIZX vs. GMTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the GMTZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIZX and GMTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGIZXGMTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.35

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.64

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.81

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.46

+0.07

Drawdowns

GGIZX vs. GMTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIZX drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, smaller than the maximum GMTZX drawdown of -43.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIZX and GMTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGIZXGMTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.00%

-43.84%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-4.95%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.91%

-6.32%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-17.76%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.33%

-17.83%

-3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-4.91%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.08%

+0.24%

Volatility

GGIZX vs. GMTZX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund (GMTZX) at 1.97%. This indicates that GGIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGIZXGMTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

1.97%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.43%

4.67%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.70%

5.71%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.39%

7.21%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

7.31%

+1.38%

GGIZX vs. GMTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GMTZX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGIZX vs. GMTZX - Dividend Comparison

GGIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than GMTZX's 5.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
7.80%8.22%4.40%4.06%7.00%5.66%4.76%6.52%4.46%2.42%3.23%16.23%
GMTZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2015 Fund
5.38%5.66%6.34%3.77%7.27%5.35%3.64%4.01%6.38%2.62%1.45%15.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GGIZX and GMTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GGIZX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to GMTZX (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIZX dropped -36.00% vs GMTZX's -43.84%.

GMTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGIZX and GMTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer