PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGHCX vs. THW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGHCX vs. THW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) and abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGHCX achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than THW's 11.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GGHCX has underperformed THW with an annualized return of 6.89%, while THW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.43% annualized return.


GGHCX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-4.20%
6M
2.25%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
6.89%
ALL TIME*
9.93%

THW

1D
0.68%
1M
-2.11%
6M
11.26%
YTD
11.66%
1Y
38.03%
3Y*
11.82%
5Y*
6.24%
10Y*
9.43%
ALL TIME*
6.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.64M$2.35M$1.80M

GGHCX vs. THW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
1.86%15.48%3.96%3.05%-13.53%12.05%14.52%32.01%0.27%15.51%
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
11.66%31.10%5.35%-11.52%-1.21%12.03%26.40%32.98%-5.40%16.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GGHCX and THW is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015

0.61

The correlation between GGHCX and THW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGHCX vs. THW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GGHCX
GGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

THW
THW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
THW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
THW Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
THW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
THW Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GGHCX vs. THW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) and abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GGHCXTHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.39

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

11.98

-9.19

GGHCX vs. THW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGHCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the THW Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGHCX and THW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGHCX vs. THW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGHCX drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, which is greater than THW's maximum drawdown of -37.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGHCX and THW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGHCXTHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

-37.36%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-11.28%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-26.76%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-31.53%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.34%

-37.36%

+8.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.48%

-2.11%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-9.60%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

3.18%

+2.98%

Volatility

GGHCX vs. THW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to abrdn World Healthcare Fund (THW) at 4.40%. This indicates that GGHCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGHCXTHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.40%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

13.60%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

18.67%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

18.82%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

21.17%

-3.72%

GGHCX vs. THW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGHCX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than THW's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGHCX vs. THW - Dividend Comparison

GGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than THW's 10.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
5.58%5.69%5.17%0.00%0.00%24.69%6.44%3.51%8.81%6.88%2.24%15.07%
THW
abrdn World Healthcare Fund
10.47%10.96%12.72%12.00%9.56%8.60%8.85%10.11%12.08%10.29%10.91%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGHCX and THW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGHCX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to THW (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGHCX dropped -40.23% vs THW's -37.36%.

THW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGHCX and THW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer