GGBFX vs. DFGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX).
GGBFX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. DFGFX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 8, 1996.
Performance
GGBFX vs. DFGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGBFX vs. DFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | -1.33% | 7.55% | 0.40% | 5.77% | -13.90% | -2.57% | 5.03% | 11.04% | -4.74% | 7.69% |
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.77% | 2.89% | 5.36% | 4.95% | -2.62% | -0.37% | 0.88% | 2.87% | 1.91% | 0.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGBFX achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than DFGFX's 0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBFX has outperformed DFGFX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while DFGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.
GGBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
DFGFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGBFX vs. DFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGBFX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGFX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGBFX vs. DFGFX — Risk / Return Rank
GGBFX
DFGFX
GGBFX vs. DFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGBFX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.64 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.78 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 2.55 | -1.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.87 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 5.76 | -1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGBFX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.64 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 1.19 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 1.29 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 2.27 | -1.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGBFX and DFGFX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GGBFX vs. DFGFX - Dividend Comparison
GGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than DFGFX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | 3.05% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 1.44% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.96% | 4.01% |
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 3.12% | 2.67% | 4.77% | 3.19% | 1.17% | 0.23% | 0.57% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 1.54% | 0.65% | 0.02% |
Drawdowns
GGBFX vs. DFGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGBFX drawdown since its inception was -27.03%, which is greater than DFGFX's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBFX and DFGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGBFX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.03% | -4.00% | -23.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.80% | -1.41% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -4.00% | -16.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.97% | -4.00% | -16.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | 0.00% | -5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -0.23% | -4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.46% | +0.48% |
Volatility
GGBFX vs. DFGFX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) at 0.22%. This indicates that GGBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGBFX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 0.22% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 0.45% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 1.56% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 1.81% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.49% | 1.36% | +3.13% |