GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO
GFT.DE (GFT Technologies SE) and EXE.TO (Extendicare Inc.) are both stocks. GFT.DE operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while EXE.TO operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, GFT.DE returned 2.50%/yr vs 20.59%/yr for EXE.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GFT.DE is traded in EUR, while EXE.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the EXE.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFT.DE achieves a 22.23% return, which is significantly lower than EXE.TO's 51.20% return. Over the past 10 years, GFT.DE has underperformed EXE.TO with an annualized return of 2.50%, while EXE.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.
GFT.DE
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- 21.84%
- YTD
- 22.23%
- 6M
- 27.34%
- 1Y
- -0.86%
- 3Y*
- -5.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
EXE.TO
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 51.20%
- 6M
- 47.70%
- 1Y
- 121.06%
- 3Y*
- 65.97%
- 5Y*
- 36.30%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFT.DE GFT Technologies SE | 22.23% | -12.46% | -27.79% | -6.65% | -25.86% | 290.19% | 4.55% | 81.08% | -47.44% | -35.39% |
EXE.TO Extendicare Inc. | 51.19% | 92.21% | 52.09% | 18.36% | -4.74% | 26.96% | -20.36% | 51.32% | -28.63% | -8.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFT.DE and EXE.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2012 | 0.15 |
The correlation between GFT.DE and EXE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GFT.DE
EXE.TO
GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GFT Technologies SE (GFT.DE) and Extendicare Inc. (EXE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFT.DE | EXE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.65 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 7.53 | -7.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 20.08 | -20.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFT.DE | EXE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 3.66 | -3.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 1.46 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.76 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.54 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFT.DE drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than EXE.TO's maximum drawdown of -50.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFT.DE and EXE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFT.DE | EXE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.96% | -50.03% | -48.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.97% | -16.17% | -26.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.30% | -21.74% | -34.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.31% | -26.52% | -42.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.71% | -50.03% | -20.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.63% | -7.33% | -53.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.38% | -14.19% | -65.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.49% | 6.10% | +18.39% |
Volatility
GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO - Volatility Comparison
GFT Technologies SE (GFT.DE) has a higher volatility of 20.31% compared to Extendicare Inc. (EXE.TO) at 14.86%. This indicates that GFT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFT.DE | EXE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.31% | 14.86% | +5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.20% | 23.86% | +13.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.89% | 33.31% | +13.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.24% | 25.08% | +19.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.83% | 27.42% | +17.41% |
Dividends
GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO - Dividend Comparison
GFT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than EXE.TO's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXE.TO Extendicare Inc. | 1.59% | 2.34% | 4.52% | 6.59% | 7.32% | 6.58% | 7.23% | 5.69% | 7.56% | 5.25% | 4.86% | 4.97% |
GFT.DE GFT Technologies SE | 2.16% | 2.64% | 2.26% | 1.44% | 1.03% | 0.43% | 1.68% | 2.58% | 4.48% | 2.30% | 1.46% | 0.79% |
Financials
GFT.DE vs. EXE.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GFT Technologies SE and Extendicare Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GFT.DE and EXE.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GFT.DE and EXE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer