GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about GFT Technologies SE (GFT.DE) and Kontron AG (KTN.DE).
Performance
GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFT.DE GFT Technologies SE | -3.38% | -12.46% | -27.79% | -6.65% | -25.86% | 290.19% | 4.55% | 81.08% | -47.44% | -35.39% |
KTN.DE Kontron AG | -15.66% | 20.14% | -7.06% | 48.05% | 8.87% | -22.95% | -9.30% | 35.68% | -11.52% | 108.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFT.DE achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly higher than KTN.DE's -15.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GFT.DE has underperformed KTN.DE with an annualized return of 0.13%, while KTN.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.
GFT.DE
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 21.35%
- YTD
- -3.38%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- 1Y
- -17.11%
- 3Y*
- -19.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.13%
KTN.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -13.30%
- YTD
- -15.66%
- 6M
- -28.99%
- 1Y
- -12.13%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GFT.DE
KTN.DE
GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GFT Technologies SE (GFT.DE) and Kontron AG (KTN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFT.DE | KTN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | -0.28 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | -0.11 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.98 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.29 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | -0.72 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFT.DE | KTN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | -0.28 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.00 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.33 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.03 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFT.DE and KTN.DE is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE - Dividend Comparison
GFT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than KTN.DE's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFT.DE GFT Technologies SE | 2.73% | 2.64% | 2.26% | 1.44% | 1.03% | 0.43% | 1.68% | 2.58% | 4.48% | 2.30% | 1.46% | 0.79% |
KTN.DE Kontron AG | 3.12% | 2.63% | 2.57% | 4.65% | 4.58% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 0.75% | 0.82% | 0.56% | 0.92% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFT.DE drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, roughly equal to the maximum KTN.DE drawdown of -98.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFT.DE and KTN.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFT.DE | KTN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.96% | -98.43% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.79% | -37.76% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.31% | -51.85% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.04% | -57.19% | -14.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.88% | -32.95% | -35.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -65.46% | -14.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.38% | 15.33% | +10.05% |
Volatility
GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GFT Technologies SE (GFT.DE) is 16.64%, while Kontron AG (KTN.DE) has a volatility of 20.97%. This indicates that GFT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFT.DE | KTN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.64% | 20.97% | -4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.22% | 33.12% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.27% | 43.09% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.33% | 40.29% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.26% | 40.87% | +3.39% |
Financials
GFT.DE vs. KTN.DE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GFT Technologies SE and Kontron AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities