GFSDX vs. THPGX
GFSDX (Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S) and THPGX (Thompson LargeCap Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past year, GFSDX returned 19.78% vs 40.52% for THPGX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GFSDX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for THPGX.
Performance
GFSDX vs. THPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFSDX achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly lower than THPGX's 11.68% return.
GFSDX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 7.12%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 19.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THPGX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 6M
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.86%
GFSDX vs. THPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GFSDX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S | 7.12% | 15.83% | -2.40% |
THPGX Thompson LargeCap Fund | 11.68% | 27.10% | -3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFSDX and THPGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GFSDX and THPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFSDX vs. THPGX — Risk / Return Rank
GFSDX
THPGX
GFSDX vs. THPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S (GFSDX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFSDX | THPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 3.31 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.19 | 4.60 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.59 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 4.98 | -1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 20.33 | -6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFSDX | THPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 3.31 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.50 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
GFSDX vs. THPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFSDX drawdown since its inception was -13.02%, smaller than the maximum THPGX drawdown of -65.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFSDX and THPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFSDX | THPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.02% | -65.52% | +52.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.51% | -8.16% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.16% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -9.58% | +7.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 2.00% | -0.54% |
Volatility
GFSDX vs. THPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S (GFSDX) is 2.34%, while Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that GFSDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFSDX | THPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 2.64% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.86% | 8.88% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.06% | 12.44% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 17.76% | -4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 19.94% | -7.02% |
GFSDX vs. THPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFSDX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than THPGX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFSDX vs. THPGX - Dividend Comparison
GFSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, which matches THPGX's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFSDX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class S | 5.04% | 5.34% | 4.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THPGX Thompson LargeCap Fund | 5.02% | 5.60% | 11.97% | 8.38% | 5.06% | 4.95% | 0.90% | 2.73% | 0.89% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFSDX and THPGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THPGX has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to GFSDX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFSDX dropped -13.02% vs THPGX's -65.52%.
THPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFSDX and THPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer