GFOF vs. DAPP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP).

GFOF and DAPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GFOF is a passively managed fund by Grayscale that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2022. DAPP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2021. Both GFOF and DAPP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GFOF vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GFOF vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	60.08%	145.49%	-68.58%
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	-9.74%	15.03%	44.87%	285.02%	-79.80%

Returns By Period

GFOF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DAPP

• 1D: 6.88%
• 1M: -6.34%
• YTD: -9.74%
• 6M: -31.40%
• 1Y: 65.23%
• 3Y*: 49.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFOF vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DAPP's 0.50% expense ratio.

GFOF

Grayscale Future of Finance ETF

DAPP

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF

Return for Risk

GFOF vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPP

DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 53
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 54
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFOF vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFOF	DAPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.17	—

Correlation

The correlation between GFOF and DAPP is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GFOF vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFOF nor DAPP has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.55%	4.08%	0.00%	0.00%
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	0.00%	0.00%	10.13%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GFOF	DAPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-91.90%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-50.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-58.23%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFOF	DAPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	66.96%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	73.29%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	73.29%	—