GFIRX vs. PQTAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX).
GFIRX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012. PQTAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013.
Performance
GFIRX vs. PQTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFIRX vs. PQTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.22% | 0.54% | -5.17% | -3.87% | 20.44% | 4.86% | 6.94% | 2.61% | -2.24% | 2.56% |
PQTAX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 3.74% | 2.06% | -3.31% | -4.52% | 11.06% | 14.52% | 8.48% | 2.63% | 1.98% | 4.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFIRX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than PQTAX's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GFIRX has underperformed PQTAX with an annualized return of 2.33%, while PQTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.55% annualized return.
GFIRX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- -0.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.43%
- 10Y*
- 2.33%
PQTAX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 1.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFIRX vs. PQTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFIRX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PQTAX's 1.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFIRX vs. PQTAX — Risk / Return Rank
GFIRX
PQTAX
GFIRX vs. PQTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFIRX | PQTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.24 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 1.70 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 3.24 | +0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFIRX | PQTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.24 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.38 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.38 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.44 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFIRX and PQTAX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GFIRX vs. PQTAX - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFIRX nor PQTAX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.11% | 7.35% | 1.21% | 7.06% | 0.16% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 3.98% |
PQTAX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.61% | 2.22% | 4.46% | 2.29% | 0.10% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 7.65% |
Drawdowns
GFIRX vs. PQTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFIRX drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum PQTAX drawdown of -28.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIRX and PQTAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFIRX | PQTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.09% | -28.39% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.15% | -8.04% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.09% | -28.39% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.09% | -28.39% | +5.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -14.28% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -9.31% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 3.36% | -1.51% |
Volatility
GFIRX vs. PQTAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) is 3.26%, while PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that GFIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFIRX | PQTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 3.59% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.23% | 6.78% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 8.82% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 9.90% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 9.42% | -0.38% |