GFGF vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GFGF (Guru Favorite Stocks ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GuruFocus, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. GFGF is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GFGF returned 17.01%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GFGF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

GFGF vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFGF achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.

GFGF

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 6M: 1.03%
• 1Y: 10.40%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 64.22%
• 6M: 60.70%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFGF vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	-0.43%	13.11%	26.12%	24.03%	-20.32%	2.13%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	64.22%	-11.86%	8.18%	-0.97%	27.57%	4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GFGF and OILK is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.01

The correlation between GFGF and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GFGF vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GFGF	OILK
Technology	32.7%	-
Financial Services	31.2%	-
Healthcare	13.6%	-
Communication Services	11.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	-
Industrials	2.5%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GFGF vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFGF

GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 21
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 23
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 20

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFGF vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFGF	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	2.06	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	2.59	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.34	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	3.42	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.35	6.91	-4.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFGF vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFGF Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFGF and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFGF	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	2.06	-1.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.12	+0.33

Drawdowns

GFGF vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFGF drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGF and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFGF	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.98%	-83.76%	+55.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.22%	-17.35%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.60%	-23.42%	+7.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	-3.66%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-32.61%	+24.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	8.56%	-4.13%

Volatility

GFGF vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) is 2.59%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that GFGF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFGF	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	10.44%	-7.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	23.26%	-13.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	28.75%	-16.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.08%	30.12%	-11.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.08%	35.97%	-16.89%

GFGF vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFGF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFGF vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

GFGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	0.21%	0.21%	0.10%	0.08%	0.42%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.18%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFGF and OILK in my portfolio?

GFGF and OILK have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GFGF or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to GFGF (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFGF dropped -27.98% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, GFGF or OILK?

On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 19.03% vs 17.01% for GFGF. On fees, GFGF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GFGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GFGF or OILK?

Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 17.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFGF or OILK?

GFGF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GFGF or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.21% for GFGF.

What is the main difference between GFGF and OILK?

GFGF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GuruFocus and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GFGF and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.