GFEB vs. APRQ
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ).
GFEB and APRQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GFEB is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Feb 16, 2023. APRQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 31, 2023.
Performance
GFEB vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFEB vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GFEB FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February | -2.17% |
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
GFEB
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFEB vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFEB vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank
GFEB
APRQ
GFEB vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February (GFEB) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFEB | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFEB | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | — | — |
Dividends
GFEB vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFEB nor APRQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GFEB vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFEB drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEB and APRQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFEB | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | 0.00% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | 0.00% | -2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.72% | 0.00% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | — | — |
Volatility
GFEB vs. APRQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFEB | APRQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 0.00% | +9.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.68% | 0.00% | +7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.68% | 0.00% | +7.68% |