GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE
GFEA.DE (VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - GFEA.DE is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained, while QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GFEA.DE returned 10.54% vs 49.47% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GFEA.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QUTM.DE.
Performance
GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFEA.DE achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 23.86% return.
GFEA.DE
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- 23.86%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 49.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GFEA.DE VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 7.91% | 2.29% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 23.86% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFEA.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GFEA.DE
QUTM.DE
GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFEA.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 1.99 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 4.79 | +9.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.88%, smaller than the maximum QUTM.DE drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEA.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFEA.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.88% | -24.77% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.45% | -24.77% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -11.10% | +10.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -7.79% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 10.29% | -9.56% |
Volatility
GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) is 2.71%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that GFEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFEA.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 12.75% | -10.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.30% | 24.53% | -19.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.67% | 33.64% | -26.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.79% | 33.19% | -25.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.56% | 33.19% | -22.63% |
GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFEA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFEA.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFEA.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFEA.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GFEA.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GFEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
GFEA.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. GFEA.DE tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GFEA.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for GFEA.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer