PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFEA.DE achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than QDVQ.DE's 2.23% return.


GFEA.DE

1D
-0.60%
1M
1.51%
YTD
5.14%
6M
4.54%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*

QDVQ.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
1.02%
YTD
2.23%
6M
1.76%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GFEA.DE
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
5.14%-2.31%12.20%6.70%-7.42%10.35%6.62%16.50%1.86%
QDVQ.DE
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.23%0.11%8.76%8.83%-9.03%10.74%7.49%18.50%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GFEA.DE and QDVQ.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018

0.55

The correlation between GFEA.DE and QDVQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFEA.DE
GFEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVQ.DE
QDVQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
QDVQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFEA.DEQDVQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.20

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

1.94

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

6.98

+2.58

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the QDVQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFEA.DE and QDVQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFEA.DEQDVQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.15

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.54

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.65

+0.12

Drawdowns

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.87%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVQ.DE drawdown of -22.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEA.DE and QDVQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFEA.DEQDVQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.87%

-22.94%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-2.90%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.98%

-9.27%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.97%

-11.15%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.24%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-2.84%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.81%

-0.06%

Volatility

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVQ.DE) at 1.21%. This indicates that GFEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFEA.DEQDVQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

1.21%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

3.53%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.85%

4.87%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.72%

6.40%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.51%

8.33%

+1.18%

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFEA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVQ.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFEA.DE vs. QDVQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

GFEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GFEA.DE
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVQ.DE
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
7.11%5.73%5.78%5.26%4.47%3.82%4.44%4.56%4.96%4.65%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFEA.DE and QDVQ.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GFEA.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GFEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QDVQ.DE.

GFEA.DE tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained, while QDVQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Corporate ex EM Fallen Angels 3% Capped. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GFEA.DE and 0.50% for QDVQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFEA.DE and QDVQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer