GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GFEA.DE (VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) and NUKL.DE (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - GFEA.DE is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained, while NUKL.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GFEA.DE returned 6.53%/yr vs 41.91%/yr for NUKL.DE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GFEA.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for NUKL.DE.

Performance

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFEA.DE achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than NUKL.DE's 11.67% return.

GFEA.DE

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: 4.54%
• 1Y: 7.23%
• 3Y*: 6.53%
• 5Y*: 4.25%
• 10Y*: —

NUKL.DE

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: 11.67%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 49.71%
• 3Y*: 41.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GFEA.DE VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF	5.14%	-2.31%	12.20%	3.20%
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A	11.67%	51.50%	38.03%	24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GFEA.DE and NUKL.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023	0.26

Return for Risk

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFEA.DE

GFEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GFEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
GFEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GFEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
GFEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

NUKL.DE

NUKL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 34
NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
NUKL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
NUKL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 32
NUKL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
NUKL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFEA.DE	NUKL.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.21	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.81	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.21	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	1.86	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.56	4.43	+5.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFEA.DE and NUKL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFEA.DE	NUKL.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.21	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.10	-0.33

Drawdowns

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.87%, smaller than the maximum NUKL.DE drawdown of -37.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEA.DE and NUKL.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFEA.DE	NUKL.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.87%	-37.52%	+14.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	-27.12%	+24.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.98%	-37.52%	+27.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-12.83%	+12.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-7.79%	+4.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	11.43%	-10.68%

Volatility

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) is 1.85%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a volatility of 11.05%. This indicates that GFEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFEA.DE	NUKL.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.85%	11.05%	-9.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.63%	28.97%	-24.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.85%	41.82%	-35.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.72%	34.24%	-26.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.51%	34.24%	-24.73%

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFEA.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKL.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFEA.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFEA.DE nor NUKL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFEA.DE and NUKL.DE in my portfolio?

GFEA.DE and NUKL.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GFEA.DE or NUKL.DE?

On fees, GFEA.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFEA.DE or NUKL.DE?

GFEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.

What is the main difference between GFEA.DE and NUKL.DE?

GFEA.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while NUKL.DE is Energy Equities. GFEA.DE tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained, while NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GFEA.DE and 0.55% for NUKL.DE.