PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFEA.DE achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than HY3M.DE's 6.33% return.


GFEA.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
0.94%
6M
6.78%
YTD
6.88%
1Y
8.93%
3Y*
7.74%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

HY3M.DE

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.99%
6M
4.72%
YTD
6.33%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GFEA.DE
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
6.88%-2.31%12.21%6.69%-7.67%10.64%6.81%16.29%-16.16%
HY3M.DE
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
6.33%-3.30%18.25%4.13%-7.66%7.35%-3.67%17.71%-14.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GFEA.DE and HY3M.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.52

The correlation between GFEA.DE and HY3M.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFEA.DE
GFEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

HY3M.DE
HY3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFEA.DEHY3M.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

3.41

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

10.01

+1.55

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFEA.DE and HY3M.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.88%, which is greater than HY3M.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFEA.DE and HY3M.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFEA.DEHY3M.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.88%

-21.08%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

-3.08%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-12.09%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.96%

-13.58%

+2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.17%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-7.04%

+2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.05%

-0.28%

Volatility

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) at 1.97%. This indicates that GFEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HY3M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFEA.DEHY3M.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

1.97%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.40%

5.14%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.01%

6.85%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.85%

8.61%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.56%

13.20%

-2.64%

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GFEA.DE and HY3M.DE have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

GFEA.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFEA.DE nor HY3M.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GFEA.DE and HY3M.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GFEA.DE and HY3M.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

GFEA.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while HY3M.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. GFEA.DE tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained, while HY3M.DE tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFEA.DE and HY3M.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer