PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFAFX vs. RGAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFAFX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GFAFX having a 10.42% return and RGAGX slightly higher at 10.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GFAFX having a 15.95% annualized return and RGAGX not far ahead at 16.43%.


GFAFX

1D
0.38%
1M
7.35%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.68%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
15.95%

RGAGX

1D
0.38%
1M
7.39%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.88%
1Y
27.52%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
16.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFAFX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1
10.42%19.66%27.96%37.15%-30.78%19.24%37.78%28.10%-3.23%26.07%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
10.60%20.08%28.41%37.66%-30.53%19.67%38.30%29.22%-2.88%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GFAFX and RGAGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009

1.00

The correlation between GFAFX and RGAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFAFX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFAFX
GFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RGAGX
RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFAFX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFAFXRGAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

1.89

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

2.57

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.08

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

8.14

-0.20

GFAFX vs. RGAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the RGAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFAFX and RGAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFAFXRGAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.89

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.63

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.84

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.86

-0.30

Drawdowns

GFAFX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFAFX drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFAFX and RGAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFAFXRGAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-36.19%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.79%

-13.71%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.57%

-21.54%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.41%

-36.19%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.41%

-36.19%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-5.49%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.50%

+0.03%

Volatility

GFAFX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1 (GFAFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) have volatilities of 3.62% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFAFXRGAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

3.63%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

11.66%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

15.17%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.25%

20.25%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

19.69%

0.00%

GFAFX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFAFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFAFX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison

GFAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, less than RGAGX's 9.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of America Class F-1
9.73%10.75%9.01%7.41%4.02%8.16%4.28%7.14%11.96%6.98%6.60%8.86%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
9.94%10.99%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.93%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, GFAFX and RGAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RGAGX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to GFAFX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFAFX dropped -51.87% vs RGAGX's -36.19%.

RGAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFAFX and RGAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer