PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFA.L vs. IHYE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GFA.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (IHYE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GFA.L is traded in USD, while IHYE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IHYE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFA.L achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than IHYE.L's -1.67% return.


GFA.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.18%
6M
3.30%
YTD
3.55%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
2.98%
10Y*

IHYE.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.30%
6M
-0.92%
YTD
-1.67%
1Y
2.44%
3Y*
6.43%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GFA.L
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.55%9.97%6.02%10.29%-12.56%1.93%16.95%13.34%-3.62%
IHYE.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
-1.67%21.11%-1.39%11.47%-16.91%-4.15%12.17%6.98%-9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GFA.L and IHYE.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018

0.65

The correlation between GFA.L and IHYE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFA.L
GFA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GFA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GFA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IHYE.L
IHYE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IHYE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHYE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHYE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IHYE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHYE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GFA.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (IHYE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFA.LIHYE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.06

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

0.36

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.76

0.83

+3.93

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the IHYE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFA.L and IHYE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.98%, smaller than the maximum IHYE.L drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFA.L and IHYE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFA.LIHYE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.98%

-32.48%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-6.84%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-9.59%

+4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.54%

-31.79%

+9.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-4.55%

+3.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-9.53%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

2.93%

-1.48%

Volatility

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GFA.L) is 1.33%, while iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (IHYE.L) has a volatility of 1.75%. This indicates that GFA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHYE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFA.LIHYE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.75%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

5.83%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.49%

7.84%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.25%

11.69%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.42%

12.03%

-3.61%

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IHYE.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFA.L vs. IHYE.L - Dividend Comparison

GFA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IHYE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GFA.L
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IHYE.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
6.19%6.07%6.32%5.59%5.13%4.35%4.82%5.59%3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFA.L and IHYE.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GFA.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GFA.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IHYE.L.

GFA.L is categorized as Global High Yield Bonds, while IHYE.L is Corporate Bonds. GFA.L tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index, while IHYE.L tracks iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GFA.L and 0.55% for IHYE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFA.L and IHYE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer