GFA.L vs. FLOA.L
GFA.L (VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - GFA.L is a Global High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index, while FLOA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GFA.L returned 2.98%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for FLOA.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GFA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLOA.L.
Performance
GFA.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFA.L achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than FLOA.L's 2.49% return.
GFA.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.98%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
GFA.L vs. FLOA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFA.L VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.55% | 9.97% | 6.02% | 10.29% | -12.56% | 1.93% | 16.95% | 13.34% | -3.43% |
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.49% | 4.89% | 6.42% | 6.65% | 1.35% | 0.42% | 0.86% | 4.17% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFA.L and FLOA.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018 | 0.09 |
The correlation between GFA.L and FLOA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFA.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GFA.L
FLOA.L
GFA.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GFA.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFA.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.89 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 9.95 | -8.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 41.15 | -36.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFA.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.98%, which is greater than FLOA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFA.L and FLOA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFA.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.98% | -14.96% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.90% | -0.46% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.03% | -1.77% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -2.53% | -20.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.15% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -0.22% | -4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 0.11% | +1.34% |
Volatility
GFA.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GFA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 0.44%. This indicates that GFA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFA.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 0.44% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.65% | 1.33% | +4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.49% | 1.64% | +4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.25% | 2.11% | +6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 4.26% | +4.16% |
GFA.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFA.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFA.L nor FLOA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFA.L and FLOA.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GFA.L.
GFA.L is categorized as Global High Yield Bonds, while FLOA.L is Corporate Bonds. GFA.L tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index, while FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GFA.L and 0.10% for FLOA.L.
Find the right allocation for GFA.L and FLOA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer