PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GEQT.TO (iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. GEQT.TO is actively managed, while ZEB.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GEQT.TO returned 14.52%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for ZEB.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEQT.TO achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 19.22% return.

GEQT.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
8.79%
YTD
14.67%
6M
12.80%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
—

ZEB.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
19.22%
6M
24.72%
1Y
60.22%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		14.67%17.85%25.42%22.35%-15.18%21.99%9.67%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF		19.22%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%13.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GEQT.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.54

The correlation between GEQT.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GEQT.TO
ZEB.TO

Technology

35.8%

-

Financial Services

28.2%
100.0%

Industrials

8.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%

-

Healthcare

4.5%

-

Communication Services

2.8%

-

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.6%

-

Utilities

1.0%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Technology

GEQT.TO
35.8%
ZEB.TO

-

Financial Services

GEQT.TO
28.2%
ZEB.TO
100.0%

Industrials

GEQT.TO
8.4%
ZEB.TO

-

Basic Materials

GEQT.TO
7.4%
ZEB.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

GEQT.TO
4.8%
ZEB.TO

-

Healthcare

GEQT.TO
4.5%
ZEB.TO

-

Communication Services

GEQT.TO
2.8%
ZEB.TO

-

Real Estate

GEQT.TO
2.7%
ZEB.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

GEQT.TO
2.6%
ZEB.TO

-

Utilities

GEQT.TO
1.0%
ZEB.TO

-

Energy

GEQT.TO
0.1%
ZEB.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio

BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Often compared with GEQT.TO:
GEQT.TO vs. XEQT.TOGEQT.TO vs. GGRO.TOGEQT.TO vs. ZAG.TOGEQT.TO vs. GBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. XEN.TOGEQT.TO vs. XBAL.TOGEQT.TO vs. VT
Often compared with ZEB.TO:
ZEB.TO vs. ZWB.TOZEB.TO vs. VDY.TOZEB.TO vs. HBNK.TOZEB.TO vs. HCAL.TOZEB.TO vs. HMAX.TOZEB.TO vs. ZSP.TOZEB.TO vs. XIC.TO

Return for Risk

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GEQT.TO
GEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GEQT.TOZEB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.17
4.79

-2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.99
6.54

-3.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.90

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

7.17

-3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

30.84

-17.57

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEQT.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GEQT.TOZEB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

4.79

-2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.35

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.94

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.88

+0.28

Drawdowns

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.64%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEQT.TO and ZEB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GEQT.TOZEB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.64%

-39.69%

+16.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-8.44%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.01%

-14.80%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.64%

-25.97%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.69%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.00%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-5.65%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.96%

+0.28%

Volatility

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) is 4.08%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that GEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GEQT.TOZEB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.89%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

11.14%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

12.62%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

13.52%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

16.91%

-2.99%

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GEQT.TO and ZEB.TO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GEQT.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

GEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.54% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEQT.TO
iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio		1.10%1.25%1.38%1.58%1.82%1.32%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF		2.54%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

GEQT.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEQT.TO and ZEB.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

GEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEQT.TO and ZEB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer