GENZ vs. TSXU
GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - GENZ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
GENZ vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -13.07% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 126.91% return.
GENZ
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- -13.07%
- 6M
- -12.16%
- 1Y
- -6.52%
- 3Y*
- -4.39%
- 5Y*
- -6.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
TSXU
- 1D
- -6.20%
- 1M
- 47.27%
- YTD
- 126.91%
- 6M
- 118.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GENZ vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | -13.07% | -5.59% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 126.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENZ and TSXU is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENZ vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
GENZ
TSXU
GENZ vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENZ | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENZ | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 3.95 | -3.89 |
Drawdowns
GENZ vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENZ | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.12% | -35.62% | -35.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.75% | -7.07% | -24.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -10.54% | -14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.28% | — | — |
Volatility
GENZ vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENZ | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 78.90% | -59.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 78.90% | -54.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 78.90% | -53.79% |
GENZ vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENZ vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than TSXU's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF | 3.84% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.28% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENZ and TSXU have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GENZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GENZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
GENZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.28% for TSXU.
GENZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. GENZ tracks MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for GENZ and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer