GENZ vs. CHPS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GENZ (VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENZ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GENZ returned -3.98%/yr vs 52.99%/yr for CHPS. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GENZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

GENZ vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENZ achieves a -5.74% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 87.17% return.

GENZ

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 9.12%
• 6M: -3.80%
• YTD: -5.74%
• 1Y: -11.43%
• 3Y*: -3.98%
• 5Y*: -3.53%
• 10Y*: 3.88%

CHPS

• 1D: -5.25%
• 1M: -8.40%
• 6M: 68.06%
• YTD: 87.17%
• 1Y: 148.08%
• 3Y*: 52.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENZ vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF	-5.74%	4.15%	-1.39%	-6.75%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	87.17%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GENZ and CHPS is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between GENZ and CHPS has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GENZ vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GENZ	CHPS
Financial Services	29.8%	0.2%
Communication Services	29.3%	0.0%
Technology	20.4%	99.6%
Consumer Cyclical	19.6%	0.0%
Industrials	0.8%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GENZ vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENZ

GENZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
GENZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GENZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
GENZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
GENZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GENZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENZ vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GENZ	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	3.48	-4.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.75	3.55	-4.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.48	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	8.37	-8.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.74	27.10	-27.83

GENZ vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENZ and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GENZ vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENZ drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENZ and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GENZ	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.12%	-39.44%	-31.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.40%	-17.80%	-8.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.40%	-39.44%	+13.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.99%	-17.80%	-8.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.56%	-9.12%	-15.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.58%	5.49%	+10.09%

Volatility

GENZ vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF (GENZ) is 6.33%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 23.50%. This indicates that GENZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GENZ	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	23.50%	-17.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.66%	37.65%	-20.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.37%	42.85%	-23.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.60%	36.44%	-11.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.06%	36.44%	-11.38%

GENZ vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GENZ vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

GENZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than CHPS's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.35%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GENZ VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF	3.54%	3.34%	2.88%	1.68%	0.44%	0.79%	0.47%	2.95%	3.43%	2.31%	3.15%	4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GENZ and CHPS in my portfolio?

GENZ and CHPS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GENZ or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (23.50%) compared to GENZ (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENZ dropped -71.12% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, GENZ or CHPS?

On 3-year performance, CHPS leads with 52.99% vs -3.98% for GENZ. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GENZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GENZ or CHPS?

Over the 3-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 52.99% return vs -3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GENZ or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GENZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GENZ or CHPS?

GENZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.35% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between GENZ and CHPS?

GENZ is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. GENZ tracks MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GENZ and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.