PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GENM vs. WEEK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GENM vs. WEEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENM achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than WEEK's 1.44% return.


GENM

1D
0.10%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.86%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WEEK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENM vs. WEEK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GENM and WEEK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GENM vs. WEEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENM
GENM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GENM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GENM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

WEEK
WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENM vs. WEEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GENMWEEKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-16.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

4.65

-3.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

29.49

-27.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.90

263.82

-255.92

GENM vs. WEEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the WEEK Sharpe Ratio of 9.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENM and WEEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GENMWEEKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

9.29

-7.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

10.05

-8.62

Drawdowns

GENM vs. WEEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENM drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, which is greater than WEEK's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENM and WEEK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENMWEEKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-0.13%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.15%

-0.13%

-2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

0.00%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-0.01%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.01%

+0.65%

Volatility

GENM vs. WEEK - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) at 0.07%. This indicates that GENM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENMWEEKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.07%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

0.25%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

0.41%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.16%

0.39%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.16%

0.39%

+2.77%

GENM vs. WEEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GENM vs. WEEK - Dividend Comparison

GENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than WEEK's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GENM
Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF
2.92%2.88%2.19%
WEEK
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF
3.72%3.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GENM and WEEK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GENM has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to WEEK (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENM dropped -2.41% vs WEEK's -0.13%.

On 1-year performance, GENM leads with 5.22% vs 3.81% for WEEK. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GENM has performed better with a 5.22% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GENM.

WEEK has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 2.92% for GENM.

GENM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while WEEK is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GENM and 0.19% for WEEK.

WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GENM and WEEK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer