GENM vs. BESF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GENM (Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GENM returned 2.36% vs 57.27% for BESF. Their -0.14 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GENM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

GENM vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENM achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 16.63% return.

GENM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -1.30%
• 6M: -0.73%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 1Y: 2.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.35%

BESF

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 1.95%
• 6M: 8.30%
• YTD: 16.63%
• 1Y: 57.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 51.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	$44.12K	$86.97K	$91.20K
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF	$253.68K	$239.24K	$203.02K

GENM vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF	0.11%	3.48%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	16.63%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GENM and BESF is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

GENM vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GENM

GENM Risk / Return Rank: 31
GENM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GENM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GENM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GENM Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GENM Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 87
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GENM vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GENM	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	2.31	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	3.10	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.38	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	5.25	-4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.02	12.22	-9.20

GENM vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENM Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENM and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GENM vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENM drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENM and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GENM	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-10.97%	+8.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.15%	-10.97%	+8.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	-8.33%	+6.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-3.24%	+2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	4.70%	-3.92%

Volatility

GENM vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) is 0.94%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that GENM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GENM	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.94%	7.35%	-6.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.07%	15.35%	-13.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.83%	24.97%	-22.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.15%	24.29%	-21.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.15%	24.29%	-21.14%

GENM vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

GENM vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

GENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than BESF's 5.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.90%	6.39%	0.00%
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF	2.97%	2.88%	2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GENM and BESF in my portfolio?

GENM and BESF have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GENM or BESF?

BESF has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to GENM (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENM dropped -2.41% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, GENM or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 57.27% vs 2.36% for GENM. On fees, GENM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GENM has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GENM or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 57.27% return vs 2.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GENM or BESF?

GENM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GENM or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 2.97% for GENM.

What is the main difference between GENM and BESF?

GENM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GENM and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.