GENM vs. ACLO
GENM (Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GENM returned 5.22% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. GENM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.
Performance
GENM vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENM achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.21% return.
GENM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GENM vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF | 1.68% | 5.10% | -0.13% |
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 5.32% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENM and ACLO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENM vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank
GENM
ACLO
GENM vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENM | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 3.41 | -2.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 19.90 | -17.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.90 | 164.37 | -156.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENM | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 7.29 | -5.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 5.10 | -3.67 |
Drawdowns
GENM vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENM drawdown since its inception was -2.41%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENM and ACLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENM | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -1.01% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.15% | -0.27% | -1.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -0.05% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.03% | +0.63% |
Volatility
GENM vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison
Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that GENM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENM | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.14% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 0.57% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | 0.73% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.16% | 1.08% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.16% | 1.08% | +2.08% |
GENM vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENM vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison
GENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF | 2.92% | 2.88% | 2.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENM and ACLO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENM has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENM dropped -2.41% vs ACLO's -1.01%.
On 1-year performance, ACLO leads with 5.31% vs 5.22% for GENM. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ACLO has performed better with a 5.31% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GENM.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.92% for GENM.
GENM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GENM and 0.20% for ACLO.
ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENM and ACLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer