GENE.L vs. SBUY.L
GENE.L (UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from UBS and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GENE.L returned 8.55%/yr vs 10.96%/yr for SBUY.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GENE.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SBUY.L.
Performance
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENE.L achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than SBUY.L's 6.48% return.
GENE.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SBUY.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENE.L UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 3.70% | 14.86% | 10.70% | 11.06% | -1.37% | 17.63% | 6.95% | 21.36% | -3.99% |
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 6.48% | 21.60% | 14.64% | 9.46% | -0.90% | 21.36% | 8.43% | 25.36% | -6.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENE.L and SBUY.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GENE.L and SBUY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Healthcare
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Consumer Cyclical
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Consumer Defensive
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Utilities
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Communication Services
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Real Estate
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Basic Materials
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Technology
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Industrials
GENE.L
SBUY.L
Energy
GENE.L
-
SBUY.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank
GENE.L
SBUY.L
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (GENE.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENE.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 5.25 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 16.93 | -8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENE.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.57 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.80 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENE.L drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum SBUY.L drawdown of -30.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENE.L and SBUY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENE.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.65% | -30.91% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -4.79% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.04% | -17.76% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.04% | -17.76% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | 0.00% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.99% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.49% | +0.48% |
Volatility
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (GENE.L) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.32%. This indicates that GENE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENE.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.32% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 7.04% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 9.81% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.96% | 13.73% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 15.51% | -0.59% |
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENE.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison
GENE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENE.L UBS ETF (IE) Global Gender Equality UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 1.69% | 1.86% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.20% | 1.62% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENE.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GENE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GENE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GENE.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.
Find the right allocation for GENE.L and SBUY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer