GEND vs. VTV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GEND (Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GEND is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past year, GEND returned 26.04% vs 28.55% for VTV. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GEND charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

GEND vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GEND having a 16.56% return and VTV slightly higher at 16.93%.

GEND

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.40%
• 6M: 8.60%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 1Y: 26.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.01%

VTV

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: 10.86%
• YTD: 16.93%
• 1Y: 28.55%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: 12.43%
• 10Y*: 12.46%
• ALL TIME*: 9.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF	$3.98K	$10.44K	$22.58K
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	$655.54M	$670.79M	$624.45M

GEND vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF	16.56%	16.84%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	16.93%	16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GEND and VTV is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2025	0.85

The correlation between GEND and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GEND vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GEND

GEND Risk / Return Rank: 90
GEND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GEND Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GEND Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GEND Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GEND Martin Ratio Rank: 89

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 94
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GEND vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GEND	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.79	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	3.98	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.51	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.09	4.52	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.78	17.46	-2.68

GEND vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEND Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEND and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GEND vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEND and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEND	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.31%	-59.27%	+45.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.40%	-6.35%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-0.89%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-7.82%	+6.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	1.64%	+0.13%

Volatility

GEND vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.54%. This indicates that GEND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEND	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	2.54%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.93%	7.73%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.76%	10.29%	+0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.79%	13.82%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.79%	16.62%	-2.83%

GEND vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEND has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

GEND vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

GEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than VTV's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF	2.66%	2.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.85%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GEND and VTV in my portfolio?

GEND and VTV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GEND or VTV?

GEND has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to VTV (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEND dropped -13.31% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, GEND or VTV?

On 1-year performance, VTV leads with 28.55% vs 26.04% for GEND. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GEND or VTV?

Over the 1-year period, VTV has performed better with a 28.55% return vs 26.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GEND or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GEND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GEND or VTV?

GEND has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.

What is the main difference between GEND and VTV?

They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GEND and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.