GEND vs. IVEP
GEND (Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF) and IVEP (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GEND is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while IVEP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. GEND is actively managed, while IVEP is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GEND charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVEP.
Performance
GEND vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GEND
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVEP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GEND vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | 1.23% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 8.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEND and IVEP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEND vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank
GEND
IVEP
GEND vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GEND | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GEND | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 2.62 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
GEND vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, which is greater than IVEP's maximum drawdown of -7.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEND and IVEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEND | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -7.34% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -3.31% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -1.97% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | — | — |
Volatility
GEND vs. IVEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEND | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 26.29% | -15.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 26.29% | -12.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 26.29% | -12.14% |
GEND vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEND has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEND vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison
GEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | 2.74% | 2.10% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEND and IVEP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEND is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEND is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.
GEND has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.
GEND is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GEND and 0.75% for IVEP.
Find the right allocation for GEND and IVEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer