PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEND vs. DFRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEND vs. DFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEND achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than DFRA's 6.16% return.


GEND

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.43%
6M
11.24%
YTD
14.28%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFRA

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.86%
6M
1.37%
YTD
6.16%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
9.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEND vs. DFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GEND and DFRA is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2025

0.70

The correlation between GEND and DFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEND vs. DFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEND
GEND Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GEND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEND Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GEND Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEND Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DFRA
DFRA Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEND vs. DFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GENDDFRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.11

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.71

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

1.77

+10.54

GEND vs. DFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEND Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the DFRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEND and DFRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEND vs. DFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum DFRA drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEND and DFRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENDDFRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.31%

-19.35%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-11.64%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-9.39%

+8.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-4.09%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

4.64%

-2.86%

Volatility

GEND vs. DFRA - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) have volatilities of 3.14% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENDDFRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

3.02%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

13.17%

-5.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

15.01%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

17.43%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

17.43%

-3.51%

GEND vs. DFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEND has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DFRA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEND vs. DFRA - Dividend Comparison

GEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than DFRA's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFRA
Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF
3.62%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%
GEND
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
2.71%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEND and DFRA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEND has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to DFRA (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEND dropped -13.31% vs DFRA's -19.35%.

On 1-year performance, GEND leads with 21.91% vs 8.19% for DFRA. On fees, GEND is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DFRA has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GEND has performed better with a 21.91% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GEND is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFRA.

DFRA has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 2.71% for GEND.

They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Donoghue Forlines. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GEND and 0.69% for DFRA.

GEND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEND and DFRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer