GEND vs. DEW
GEND (Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF) and DEW (WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GEND is actively managed, while DEW is passively managed. Over the past year, GEND returned 25.44% vs 25.31% for DEW. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GEND charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DEW.
Performance
GEND vs. DEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GEND having a 11.95% return and DEW slightly lower at 11.59%.
GEND
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEW
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 25.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
GEND vs. DEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | 11.95% | 16.61% |
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 11.59% | 23.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEND and DEW is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GEND and DEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEND vs. DEW — Risk / Return Rank
GEND
DEW
GEND vs. DEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GEND | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 4.01 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.48 | 15.80 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GEND | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.64 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.28 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
GEND vs. DEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEND drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum DEW drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEND and DEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEND | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -65.55% | +52.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.40% | -6.34% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.29% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -12.44% | +10.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 1.61% | +0.15% |
Volatility
GEND vs. DEW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is 2.56%, while WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that GEND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEND | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 2.79% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 7.16% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 9.61% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 12.99% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 15.53% | -1.38% |
GEND vs. DEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEND has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DEW's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEND vs. DEW - Dividend Comparison
GEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than DEW's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 3.22% | 3.71% | 4.02% | 4.55% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.10% | 3.74% | 4.17% | 3.18% | 3.42% | 4.32% |
GEND Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | 2.74% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEND and DEW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEW has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to GEND (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEND dropped -13.31% vs DEW's -65.55%.
On 1-year performance, GEND leads with 25.44% vs 25.31% for DEW. On fees, GEND is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, GEND has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GEND has performed better with a 25.44% return vs 25.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GEND is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.
DEW has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.74% for GEND.
They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GEND and 0.58% for DEW.
DEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEND and DEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer