PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEND.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Global Gender Equality DR UCITS (GEND.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GEND.L is traded in GBP, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


GEND.L

1D
0.63%
1M
1.94%
YTD
3.88%
6M
5.71%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GEND.L
Lyxor Global Gender Equality DR UCITS
3.88%14.61%9.03%10.71%-5.64%17.68%6.53%21.77%0.11%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%23.29%-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GEND.L and MWRD.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.75

The correlation between GEND.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GEND.L
MWRD.L

Financial Services

22.5%
14.7%

Healthcare

15.2%
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
6.7%

Communication Services

9.9%
7.5%

Utilities

7.0%
2.4%

Industrials

6.9%
10.6%

Technology

6.2%
24.7%

Real Estate

5.2%
2.4%

Basic Materials

4.7%
3.8%

Energy

-

4.4%

Financial Services

GEND.L
22.5%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Healthcare

GEND.L
15.2%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GEND.L
12.0%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

GEND.L
10.5%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Communication Services

GEND.L
9.9%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Utilities

GEND.L
7.0%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Industrials

GEND.L
6.9%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Technology

GEND.L
6.2%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Real Estate

GEND.L
5.2%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Basic Materials

GEND.L
4.7%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Energy

GEND.L

-

MWRD.L
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEND.L
GEND.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GEND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GEND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Gender Equality DR UCITS (GEND.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEND.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEND.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

Drawdowns

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEND.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

Volatility

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEND.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.31%

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEND.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GEND.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEND.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GEND.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GEND.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GEND.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEND.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer